Stockchase Opinions

Ian R. Campbell A Comment -- General Comments From an Expert A Commentary COMMENT Sep 17, 2008

Are you thinking 'between the lines' about the current U.S. Financial Industry Turmoil? I made the following points (among others) in posts I made to StockResearchPortalBlog.com last Saturday morning (before the Lehman Brothers demise) and yesterday morning. I am repeating them in this e-mail for your consideration. 1. Each day (and virtually each hour) new negative U.S. based financial events are reported. 2. These events are occurring immediately before the U.S. Presidential election, in circumstances where one would think the current U.S. Government would exercise a 'postponement strategy' until after November 4 if they had any option to do that. 3. Critically important decisions are being taken in very short time spans, which is contrary to the way things should work. 4. "Until U.S. housing prices stabilize and U.S. Consumer confidence grows, I worry 'Canada's favourite neighbour' will simply go from (major financial) problem to problem". I made this comment on Saturday before Alan Greenspan stated this same thing in a Sunday television interview. 5. The U.S. Government, frankly to my surprise, did not support Lehman Brothers.ie 6. Bank of America announced Monday it is buying Merrill Lynch, with various prices being publicly stated - one of which suggests a price that is a 70% premium to last Friday's stock price close. This is being done in circumstances where rumor has it Merrill Lynch might otherwise have gone the way of Lehman Brothers. In the 'valuation world' I am familiar with, premium prices are not paid for distressed assets unless there is competitive bidding for them. So why the premium? Transactions often close following detailed due diligence at prices less than first offered. Could this be one of them? 7. The U.S. Federal Reserve apparently announced Monday it will expand access to credit for struggling financial companies - which to me seems indirectly to circumvent Henry Paulson's strong position made last Friday that the U.S. Government would not provide aid to Lehman. 8. 10 'Global Banks' apparently agreed Monday to buttress the U.S. Government's efforts by providing $70 billion in a new 'lending program'. Where does this money come from? Could it be as simple as a pass-through from the U.S. Government in circumstances where aid is given to a specific financial firm without the U.S. Government having to appear to be the benefactor? 9. Early Monday morning the Wall Street Journal reported that American International Group Inc., a major U.S. insurer whose shares dropped 31% last Friday, is seeking a $40 billion bridge loan from the Federal Reserve. The AIG circumstance has deteriorated since then with numerous reports and commentaries being made this morning. 10. It was reported on Monday that China's central bank, 'acting against a background of extreme stress in global financial markets', on Monday cut benchmark lending rates by 0.27% lowering the cost of one-year bank loans to 7.2% (effective September 17), and the 'reserve requirement' for all but China's 5 biggest banks by 1% (effective September 25). This to me is interesting evidence of the immediate 'ripple effect' U.S. financial system issues have, and will continue to have, on the global economy. All of these things, individually and particularly in combination, suggest to me the U.S. Financial System clearly is uncharted waters, and may well be on a collision course with an iceberg that is close at hand. Under any circumstance we are living in interesting times.
It's the ideal tool to help you make quicker, more informed decisions for managing and tracking your investments.

You might be interested:

COMMENT
Past 6 weeks in ETFs.

These past 6 weeks remind him of a quote from Lenin: "There are decades when nothing happens, and then weeks when decades happen." Between tariff announcements and then reversals, and sudden intraday shocks and moves in the stock market and in currencies, it's been an extremely volatile time. It's very cloudy and confusing. His ETF research desk has been inundated with questions.

COMMENT
Sector for safety.

On the whole, he's not seeing the market retrench entirely out of equities. Money flows are split almost evenly between fixed income and equities. 2024 was a year of bull markets all the way, a record year for ETFs flows both in Canada and in the US, driven mainly by demand for the Mag 7 and the S&P 500. 

There's still a lingering desire and wish for those growth stocks to continue driving as the engine for the economy. But we're starting to see branches of flows moving into low volatility equities and certain aspects of fixed income, as well as buffers and other strategies for capital preservation.

COMMENT
The appeal of ETFs.

They're highly efficient, giving you incredibly diversified exposure sometimes to thousands of stocks all at once. Enormous liquidity. Market makers stand ready throughout the day to execute huge orders. Primary and favoured vehicle for large institutions that want to turn over billions of dollars on a dime. 

Incredibly low fees and very tight spreads benefit investors as a whole. Smaller investors can piggyback onto this world-class institutional liquidity built around the ETF ecosystem. People who've just sold their stocks often move into ETFs so that they can maintain some type of market exposure.

COMMENT
Share buybacks.

Buybacks are similar to dividends. A way for a corporation to return money to shareholders. The company just takes cash on hand from its operations and reduces their share count. The remaining shareholders see a little bit of a price increase and accretion of company ownership. It can insulate the share price from dropping or, controversially, to prevent large stock options from vesting. In theory, it's no different from a dividend.

Thing is, we live in the real world where there are things like taxation. Most investors would much prefer to see capital appreciation rather than income ongoing. 

COMMENT
ETF that focuses on share buybacks?

You may find some if you search for "shareholder yield". Invesco partnered with some index companies in trying to understand shareholder yield as the core concept. Shareholder yield combines dividends and buybacks as the true signal for how companies return capital to shareholders.

Look in the US. There was one in Canada, but it delisted.

COMMENT
Canada's job numbers.

Definitely could get worse. We're seeing the early effects of a once in a thousand years president of the US and all its repercussions. 

If you look at Q1 numbers for US companies and what they were projecting for the second half of the year, auto companies all pulled guidance. Same thing with the airlines. Other companies, while not pulling guidance, have said it's really murky for the second half. 

COMMENT
Tariffs.

We're slowly seeing the US walk back on all the extreme reciprocal tariffs that they announced on "liberation day". Now we're getting discussions with other countries such as the UK and China. That leaves about 193 countries to go. A long road, but going in the right direction.

From here we should, hopefully, see some stability in the markets.

COMMENT
Outlook for 2025.

Critical thing is going to be what the impact is for the consumer. There's going to be a pass-through of tariffs, and it depends on who bears the brunt -- manufacturer, importer, or consumer. Inflation's going to be coming through. Layoffs may tick up.

Then it's up to the Fed whether to tolerate the inflation as a one-off, or to focus on labour, when it decides whether to guide down or not. Jerome Powell really differentiates between his role and that of the government; he sees it as his job to ensure full employment with inflation around 2%. He's not anticipating, but is waiting for hard data, and it's difficult with tariffs in flux. To lower rates now would be putting fuel on the fire, exactly what you don't want.

COMMENT
Investing strategy in these uncertain times.

People will change their stripes as they get affected by different things. Current US president is blowing everything up from defunding research to challenging universities. 

His firm hasn't changed its approach. They look at everything from a bottom-up perspective. They have target prices on all stocks in a concentrated portfolio of 32-33 names. They also have target position sizes; if a stock drops, the team debates whether to buy it up to a full position. The macro is changing; but their method remains consistent, and that's served them well through current and past crises.

Upcoming mid-term elections plus lawsuits challenging tariffs should work in investors' favour. We have to hope that rules will fall into place and we can all move forward.